b2match alternative: matchmaking that explains every meeting and runs your events too
Looking for a b2match alternative? All Along matches every attendee with the few people they should meet, shows why and runs your events. Compare both here.
Co-founder and Product Lead, All Along
b2match is a capable end-to-end matchmaking platform, built for structured B2B events like brokerage days, trade missions and supplier programmes. It handles registration, scheduling, a meeting engine and in-platform video rooms, and it is genuinely good at running a lot of pre-booked meetings in one place. The trade-off is that you build and tune the matching rules yourself, and the reasoning behind each pairing stays in the background. All Along takes a narrower, sharper line. It matches every attendee with the few people they should actually meet, puts a clear reason on each match that the person can see and sets up in about five minutes from a single attendee list. The same engine runs a standing community and a live event, so you are not configuring rules or learning a second tool. Here is how they compare.
If you are still scoping the category more broadly, it is worth reading how to judge event matchmaking software on match quality, not features and what to look for in business networking event software. This page is the head-to-head once b2match is already on your shortlist.
How b2match and All Along compare
| Dimension | b2match | All Along |
|---|---|---|
| Matching approach | A meeting engine you configure with categories and rules, pairing delegates on the criteria you set up | Intelligent matching that reads what each person wants and offers, then pairs on genuine relevance - no rules to design |
| Setup time | Hours to days - build the event, define the matching criteria, configure the meeting schedule | About five minutes - upload the attendee list, matching runs, done |
| Why the match | Delegates receive a meeting suggestion; the logic behind the pairing is not shown to them | Every match carries a clear reason each person can see - who they are meeting and exactly why |
| Attendee experience | A full meeting diary of pre-booked one-to-ones, in-platform video rooms, mobile app | The few people worth meeting, an easy way to connect, no diary to manage |
| Where it works | One structured matchmaking event at a time, online, in person or hybrid | One engine for a standing community and for live events - the same matching for both |
| Best suited for | Brokerage events and trade missions that need a full pre-booked meeting schedule and built-in video | Organisers who want explained, relevance-led matching that sets up in minutes and covers recurring events |
When to choose All Along instead
Choose All Along if you want every attendee to understand why they have been matched, not just who with. A stated reason on each introduction builds trust and lifts the response rate, and it makes the match feel considered rather than mechanical. You also avoid the configuration work - there are no categories or rules to design and maintain, because the matching reads what people want and offer and does the thinking. And you get one engine for two jobs: the standing community matching that keeps people connecting between events, and the event matching when everyone is in a room. If setup speed, match quality and a reason on every introduction matter more than running a full pre-booked meeting diary, All Along is the better fit.
When b2match might be better
b2match is the stronger choice when the event format is the structured meeting schedule itself - a brokerage day, a trade mission or a funded matchmaking programme where the deliverable is a packed diary of pre-arranged one-to-ones with rooms, slots and video built in. If you need delegates to request, accept and reschedule large numbers of meetings inside one platform, manage multilingual delegations or run the whole thing virtually with in-platform video, that depth is b2match's home ground. All Along deliberately does not try to be a full meeting-scheduling suite, so if the pre-booked diary is the point of the event, b2match fits the job better.
The honest summary: b2match and All Along are built for different jobs. If getting the right people to actually meet is the outcome you are judged on, see how All Along works, or run the free networking gap calculator to see where your current set-up falls short before you commit to either platform.
Frequently asked questions
Does All Along schedule back-to-back meetings like b2match?
No. All Along surfaces the few people each attendee should meet, with a reason and an easy way to connect. It is not a full meeting-diary scheduler. If a packed schedule of pre-booked one-to-ones is the format, b2match is built for that; if the goal is the right few conversations, All Along is.
Can All Along replace b2match for a recurring matchmaking programme?
For many organisers, yes. The same engine runs standing community matching between events and live-event matching on the day, with a clear reason on every match and almost no setup. The difference is the explanation and the relevance, not the size of the meeting diary.
Do we have to configure matching rules?
No. You share your attendee list and matching runs. There are no categories or rules to build, which is the main day-to-day difference from configuring a meeting engine yourself.
About the author
Cate Trotter
Co-founder and Product Lead, All Along
Cate is co-founder and product lead at All Along. She's spent 15+ years helping organisations turn emerging tech into commercial results, and founded and sold two retail-focused businesses before building All Along. She writes about how events can turn networking from a happy accident into a repeatable outcome.
Connect on LinkedInReady to make networking the reason people come back?
All Along gives every attendee three people they should actually meet, and gives you a complete picture of what your audience wants.
More from Field Notes
Simple event networking tool: the five jobs it must do
Most organisers do not need a 47-feature platform. They need a tool that does five jobs well. Here are the five jobs - and how to spot a tool that has quietly added another forty.
Event networking platform: three questions before you buy
Most platform decisions are made on feature grids and unmade in implementation. Three questions separate a platform worth signing from one that will quietly bruise your team for a year.
Event matchmaking software: judging match quality not features
Most shortlists for event matchmaking software get built on the wrong grid. Here's the short test I run instead - on client events, and on our own product.
