Cvent alternative: focused attendee matchmaking without the platform overhead
Cvent's 2026 release added attendee recommendations with a written reason, so Cvent can now explain a match too. What's left is scope, not capability.
Co-founder and Product Lead, All Along
The short answer. If you need registration, venue sourcing, an attendee app and enterprise reporting in one system, Cvent does all of it and nothing here will change that. It is also no longer true that Cvent cannot explain a match - their 2026 release added attendee recommendations with a written reason, so the honest gap is narrower than it was a year ago. What is left is scope and commitment: Cvent is a platform you adopt, and All Along is one job you can add to whatever you already run, from a spreadsheet, without a procurement process.
Most pages like this one are a year out of date, and in this category a year is a long time. Cvent announced a large set of networking features in July 2026, including attendee recommendations that explain why two people were suggested to each other. Any comparison that still tells you Cvent cannot do that is not worth reading, so this one does not. The two products still differ, and the difference is about scope and how much you have to take on - not about whether one of them can write a sentence.
If you are still scoping the category more broadly, it is worth reading the three questions to ask before you buy an event networking platform and why most people leave an event without meeting anyone useful. This page is the head-to-head once Cvent is already on your shortlist.
How Cvent and All Along compare
Every row below says who we think does that job better, including the rows where the answer is Cvent. A comparison written by one of the two companies is only worth reading if it is willing to lose an argument, so here are the ones we lose.
| What you need it to do | Cvent | All Along | Better here |
|---|---|---|---|
| Find and book venues | A supplier network covering hotels and venues worldwide in many languages, free to browse, with unlimited requests for proposal and bid management on top | Nothing. We have no view of venues and no opinion about them | Cvent |
| Plug into the systems the rest of the organisation runs on | Pre-built connections into the major sales and marketing systems, the main association management systems, and corporate travel and expense tools | A spreadsheet in, matches out. Nothing flows back into your other systems automatically | Cvent |
| Run registration and the door | Registration, an attendee app, and an onsite check-in product with kiosks, badge printing, hardware and staffed support | None of it. All Along sits behind whatever you already use to register people | Cvent |
| Recommend who an attendee should meet, and say why | Added in 2026. Attendees get recommended connections, and one of the new features explains the basis for the suggestion and offers a way to open the conversation | The same idea, but it is the whole product rather than one feature inside a platform. The reason is written from what both people said they were working on, and it is the thing we are judged on | Line ball |
| Get it running without a project | A platform to implement and configure with an account team. Cvent publishes no timeline for this and we are not going to invent one - though they do market some of their simpler products as launching quickly | Upload a list, pick when matches go out. No call, no configuration, no procurement | All Along |
| Know the price before you speak to anyone | No prices are published. Pricing is quote-only, gathered through a form | On the homepage. Free under fifty people, then a flat per-event fee with a money-back guarantee | All Along |
| Add matching to an event you are already running elsewhere | Networking lives inside the Cvent platform, so it comes with the platform | Designed for it. You keep your registration, your app and your agenda, and add matching next to them | All Along |
| Run one small event to see whether it works | Cvent does sell a simplified product aimed at smaller in-person events, so this is not the open goal it once was, but it is still a platform decision rather than a single event | Free under fifty people, and the free tier is the whole product rather than a preview | All Along |
Everything in that table about Cvent was checked against their own website on 18 August 2026, and the pages we used are listed at the bottom of this post. Products move. If you find something out of date here, tell us and we will correct it.
What All Along costs
We publish our prices. Events under fifty people are free, with the full matching and the full report rather than a limited trial. Above that it is a flat fee for the event: as at August 2026, AU$209 for up to a hundred attendees and AU$419 for up to two hundred and fifty, roughly AU$1.70 to AU$2.10 a head, with a money-back guarantee on every paid plan. You are charged on the number of people you invite, not the number who complete the form, so the cost is known before you start. Free events over fifty people are not charged for. Larger events and multi-event programmes are quoted, and communities that want matching running all year subscribe monthly.
Full plans and what is included are on the events pricing and community pricing pages.
What we can see that a bigger platform cannot
Every event that has run on All Along has produced the same kind of material, and it is material a registration system never collects. Before the event, each attendee wrote down in their own words what they came for - across construction technology, law, cyber security, startup communities and general professional networking. That is a small body of evidence and we would rather say so than dress it up. But it is first-party and it is specific, and it is the raw material for the report an organiser gets afterwards: what this room came wanting, who could have helped, and where the gaps were. Registration data tells you who turned up. It does not tell you what any of them needed.
“It worked really well and added structure and something different. It puts more intentionality behind what the event is trying to do, and the level of detail in the matches gives people a really good starting point. The process of getting it all organised was very easy, and the insights are very comprehensive and a good value add.”
Choose Cvent if
- You need venue sourcing. The supplier network is a two-sided marketplace built over decades and there is no equivalent anywhere in our product.
- The event data has to land in the systems the rest of the organisation runs on - the sales platform, the association management system, corporate travel. Cvent has pre-built connections into all of it and we have none.
- You are running the door as well as the room, with check-in kiosks, printed badges and someone on site when a printer jams.
- You are buying a platform on purpose - one contract, one vendor, one security review - and consolidating tools is the point of the exercise.
- You want recommendations inside the same app your attendees already have open, rather than a second thing to log into.
Choose All Along if
- You already have registration sorted and what is missing is that people leave without having met anyone useful.
- You want the matching itself to be the thing someone is accountable for, rather than one feature competing for attention inside a much larger roadmap.
- You need this working on an event that is weeks away, not a platform decision that runs through procurement.
- Your events are small or mid-sized, and most of a full platform would go unused.
- You want to know what it costs without filling in a form and waiting.
The honest summary: Cvent and All Along are built for different jobs. If getting the right people to actually meet is the outcome you are judged on, see how All Along works, or run the free networking gap calculator to see where your current set-up falls short before you commit to either platform.
Other comparisons
Most people reading this are weighing more than two names. The rest of our head-to-heads, written to the same standard and checked against each company’s own website: Grip, Braindate, Whova, Swapcard and Zoho Backstage.
Frequently asked questions
Cvent added attendee recommendations in 2026. Why would I add anything else?
Often you would not. If you already run Cvent and the recommendations are working for your attendees, use them. The case for a separate matching layer is when networking is the outcome your event is judged on and you want it to be somebody's whole job, or when you run events outside the platform, or when the events are small enough that the platform is more than they need.
Can All Along replace Cvent?
No, and it is not trying to. Cvent handles registration, venue sourcing, onsite check-in and enterprise integration. All Along does the matching and hands you a report on what the room wanted. If you need the platform, you need the platform.
Does All Along integrate with Cvent?
Not natively. We take attendee data as a spreadsheet upload, which means there is nothing to build and nothing to approve, but it also means the data does not flow back. If two-way integration is a requirement, that is a real point in Cvent's favour.
What does All Along cost compared with Cvent?
We cannot answer the second half of that, because Cvent does not publish prices - you request a quote. Ours are on the homepage: free under fifty attendees, then a flat per-event fee with a money-back guarantee. Comparing a published per-event price with a quoted annual platform is not really a like-for-like comparison, and you should treat any page that claims otherwise with suspicion.
About the author
Cate Trotter
Co-founder and Product Lead, All Along
Cate is co-founder and product lead at All Along. She's spent 15+ years helping organisations turn emerging tech into commercial results, and founded and sold two retail-focused businesses before building All Along. She writes about how events can turn networking from a happy accident into a repeatable outcome.
Connect on LinkedInReady to make networking the reason people come back?
All Along gives every attendee three people they should actually meet, and gives you a complete picture of what your audience wants.
More from Field Notes
SpeedNetworking.com alternative: curated matches, not just rotations
Speed networking fills the clock with short meetings. If you want the few right conversations with a reason - across a whole event, not one timed session - here's the comparison.
Jublia alternative: explained matchmaking built for mid-market events
Jublia is built for big trade-show floors. If your event is mid-market and the job is meeting the right people, here's the honest comparison.
Bizzabo alternative: matchmaking depth without buying the whole platform
Bizzabo builds networking into a full event platform. If what you need is sharp, explained matching alongside the tools you already use, here's the head-to-head.
