Eventify alternative: an honest comparison for event organisers
An honest Eventify alternative comparison - how their tag matching works, where Eventify wins, what each publishes about price, and which suits your event.
Co-founder and Product Lead, All Along
The short answer. Eventify is a full event platform - registration, ticketing, badge printing, check-in, an app with video meetings and community forums - and matchmaking is one of the things it does. Their matching runs on tags: the organiser picks up to twenty, attendees choose from that list, and the output is a ranked percentage. All Along does one job and does it from free text. Two or three questions on the registration form you already use, and each person gets a short list with a sentence explaining every name. If you need the whole platform, buy theirs.
Of the thirty-six competitors we looked at properly, Eventify is one of the few where a buyer really could go either way. They sell to community meetups and non-profits as well as conferences, they compete on price, and matchmaking is at the front of their marketing rather than buried in a feature list. So this comparison is worth doing carefully. The substantive difference is the shape of the input. A tag list is a vocabulary somebody wrote in advance; the useful thing a person needs help with this month is very often not on it. We ask an open question instead and read the answer.
If you are still scoping the category more broadly, it is worth reading the three questions to ask before you buy an event networking platform and why most people leave an event without meeting anyone useful. This page is the head-to-head once Eventify is already on your shortlist.
How Eventify and All Along compare
Every row below says who we think does that job better, including the rows where the answer is Eventify. A comparison written by one of the two companies is only worth reading if it is willing to lose an argument, so here are the ones we lose.
| What you need it to do | Eventify | All Along | Better here |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run registration, ticketing and the door | Registration, ticketing, onsite check-in and badge printing are all Eventify products, bought under one contract with everything else | None of it. We take a list out of the tool you already use and we have no intention of replacing it | Eventify |
| Give attendees an app to actually meet in | One-to-one live video chat inside the app and meeting booking with mutual consent, saved to the agenda automatically | No app and no video. Matches arrive by email and on a web page, and the meeting happens wherever the two of them decide | Eventify |
| Keep a community going between events | Community forums, gamification and live polls sit alongside the event product | We have a community matching mode, but there is no feed, no forum and nothing to log into between events | Eventify |
| Show how confident the system is | A percentage score against each match, ranking the top ones - their own screenshots show figures as high as 98 per cent | No score. We think a number invites an argument about the number, but it is a real thing they show and we do not | Eventify |
| Match on something that was not on the list | Their own description is that the organiser selects up to twenty tags in the backend and attendees must choose from them. Matching is on shared tags, so a need nobody thought to add cannot be matched on | Two or three open questions. If somebody writes that they are trying to work out how to price a second product line, that sentence is what the match is made from | All Along |
| Tell an attendee why this particular person | The published output is a ranked list with a percentage. We could find no published description of a written reason shown for an individual match, checked 18 August 2026 | Every match comes with a short written reason drawn from what both people said, so the first sentence of the conversation is already there | All Along |
| Find out what it costs | Four plans - Register, Engage, Advance and Ultimate - each showing Contact Us where a price would be, while another of their pages says nobody can match their pricing | Free under fifty people, then AU$209 to a hundred and AU$419 to two hundred and fifty, printed on our homepage | All Along |
| Set it up without configuring anything | Somebody has to choose the tag vocabulary before registration opens, and the quality of the matching depends on how well they chose | Nothing to configure. The questions are the same for every event and the answers do the work | All Along |
Everything in that table about Eventify was checked against their own website on 19 August 2026, and the pages we used are listed at the bottom of this post. Products move. If you find something out of date here, tell us and we will correct it.
What All Along costs
We publish our prices and Eventify do not, which is the one place this comparison is genuinely lopsided. Their pricing page carries four plans - Register, Engage, Advance and Ultimate - and every one of them says Contact Us where a figure would be, while a separate page of theirs says nobody can match their pricing. It may well be excellent. You cannot find out without asking. Ours: events under fifty people are free, with the full matching and the full report, not a trial and not a cut-down version. Above that it is a flat fee for the event, as at August 2026: AU$209 for up to a hundred attendees and AU$419 for up to two hundred and fifty, roughly AU$1.70 to AU$2.10 a person, with a money-back guarantee on every paid plan. Plans are priced on the number of people you invite, not the number who fill the form in. Larger events and multi-event programmes are quoted, and community subscriptions are priced monthly.
Full plans and what is included are on the events pricing and community pricing pages.
What we can see that a bigger platform cannot
The argument about tags against open text is not a hunch, and here is the evidence we have for it, limits included. Everyone who registers for an All Along event writes, in their own words, what they are working on and what they can offer, and the striking thing when you read those answers is how specific they are. A tag list would have caught the topic and lost the sentence. It is a small body of evidence and we would rather say so than dress it up - but the sentence is what makes an introduction land, and no vocabulary written in advance contains it.
“It's a big relief as an organiser. You can't always trust that people are going to know how to network or be confident enough to approach someone - and lots of lawyers are actually introverts. I think all organisers should offer this at every event.”
Choose Eventify if
- You need registration, ticketing, check-in and badges as well as matching. That is a platform and we are not one.
- Your attendees expect to meet inside an app - video chat, booked meetings that land on the agenda, forums to come back to.
- You want a community running between events, with a feed and gamification rather than a quiet gap.
- A confidence score against each match is useful to you. They publish one and we deliberately do not.
- You are consolidating vendors and would rather have one contract than two.
Choose All Along if
- You already have registration sorted and the gap is the introductions.
- The interesting thing about your audience will not fit in a tag. Most of the useful answers we see are a sentence, not a category.
- You want each person told why they were matched, in the words both of them used.
- You want to know the price before you have a sales conversation - or the event is under fifty people, in which case there is not one to have.
- You do not want to spend an afternoon choosing a tag vocabulary before registration can open.
The honest summary: Eventify and All Along are built for different jobs. If getting the right people to actually meet is the outcome you are judged on, see how All Along works, or run the free networking gap calculator to see where your current set-up falls short before you commit to either platform.
Other comparisons
Most people reading this are weighing more than two names. The rest of our head-to-heads, written to the same standard and checked against each company’s own website: Grip, Braindate, Whova, Cvent and Swapcard.
Frequently asked questions
How does Eventify's matching actually work?
On tags. Their own description is that the organiser selects up to twenty relevant tags or interests in the backend and attendees must choose from them, and the system then ranks the best matches with a percentage score. It is a clean, fast mechanism. Its limit is the vocabulary: a need nobody thought to add to the list cannot be matched on.
What does Eventify cost?
They do not publish it. All four plans on their pricing page show Contact Us, so the only way to find out is to ask. That is a normal model in this category and not a criticism - but it does mean you cannot compare the two of us on price without a call, and you can compare ours in about ten seconds.
Can we use All Along alongside Eventify rather than instead of it?
Yes. If Eventify lets you add a couple of custom questions to registration and export the attendee list, All Along works next to it - no second login for attendees and nothing for you to migrate.
How is a match explained to the attendee?
Each person gets a short written reason for every match, built from what both people said they were working on and what they were looking for. It is the sentence you would have said if you had introduced them yourself. That explanation is the product, not a feature bolted onto a list of names.
About the author
Cate Trotter
Co-founder and Product Lead, All Along
Cate is co-founder and product lead at All Along. She's spent 15+ years helping organisations turn emerging tech into commercial results, and founded and sold two retail-focused businesses before building All Along. She writes about how events can turn networking from a happy accident into a repeatable outcome.
Connect on LinkedInReady to make networking the reason people come back?
All Along gives every attendee three people they should actually meet, and gives you a complete picture of what your audience wants.
More from Field Notes
RingCentral Events alternative: an honest comparison (formerly Hopin)
If you searched for Hopin: it's now RingCentral Events. Here's the honest comparison with a matching layer, including the four rows where they win.
Converve alternative: an honest comparison for event organisers
Converve gives the organiser levers - who may meet whom, enforced, on a timetable. We give the attendee a sentence. Here's the honest head-to-head.
Remo alternative: an honest comparison for event organisers
Remo's matchmaking is the closest thing to ours that we compare against, and their page says so plainly. The real difference is the venue - here's the honest version.
